Gun Violence in America: The Need for Stricter Gun Laws
A brief overview on America’s Gun Violence
Gun violence is a pressing issue in the United States, with profound impacts on public health and safety. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there were 45,222 gun-related deaths in the U.S. in 2020, including homicides, suicides, and accidental shootings. This represents an alarming increase in gun violence over recent years, highlighting the urgent need for effective policy interventions.
In relation to other high-income countries, America leads the world in gun related violence. The 13.6 per 100,000 people rate impacted by gun violence is substantially higher than in other developed countries. For instance, in Canada, the firearm death rate was 2.1 per 100,000 people in 2020, according to Statistics Canada. Similarly, in the United Kingdom, the rate was only 0.2 per 100,000 in 2020, as reported by the UK Office for National Statistics.
A study published in The American Journal of Medicine found that among 23 high-income countries, the U.S. accounted for 82% of all firearm deaths, despite having only about 4% of the combined population of these nations. This disproportionate figure underscores the exceptional nature of gun violence in the U.S. compared to its peers.
One of the primary reasons for the higher rates of gun violence in the U.S. is the prevalence of gun ownership. The Small Arms Survey estimates that there are about 120.5 guns per 100 residents in the United States, the highest rate of civilian gun ownership in the world. In contrast, countries like Japan and the United Kingdom have strict gun control laws and significantly lower rates of gun ownership, contributing to their lower rates of gun violence. For example, Japan has an estimated 0.3 guns per 100 residents and an extremely low gun-related death rate of 0.02 per 100,000 people.
Stricter gun laws in other countries have been associated with lower rates of gun violence. Australia provides a notable example of successful gun control. Following a mass shooting in 1996, Australia implemented comprehensive gun control measures, including a gun buyback program, mandatory background checks, and a ban on certain types of firearms. According to a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), these measures resulted in a 59% decline in the firearm homicide rate and a 65% decline in the firearm suicide rate over the next decade.
In contrast, the patchwork nature of gun laws in the United States, with significant variations between states, contributes to the country's higher rates of gun violence. States with stricter gun laws tend to have lower rates of gun deaths. For instance, Massachusetts, which has some of the strictest gun laws in the country, had a firearm death rate of 3.7 per 100,000 in 2020, compared to Alaska's rate of 24.4 per 100,000, where gun laws are much more permissive, according to the CDC.
Research consistently shows that states with stronger gun regulations experience lower rates of firearm homicides, suicides, and mass shootings. By closing loopholes that allow private sales without background checks and implementing stringent measures to track and limit gun ownership, comprehensive gun laws can significantly curb the flow of illegal firearms, reduce crime, and save lives.
Comprehensive gun laws include background checks as an initial step. Currently, federal law requires background checks for gun sales by licensed dealers but not for private sales or gun shows. This loophole allows individuals who might be prohibited from owning firearms to obtain them through private transactions. Expanding background checks to include all gun sales is an effort to prevent guns from falling into the wrong hands.
A study published in JAMA Internal Medicine found that states with universal background checks for all gun sales experienced a 15% reduction in firearm homicides compared to states without such laws. This study analyzed data from 1991 to 2016 across various states, demonstrating the long-term benefits of comprehensive background checks.
In addition to background checks, comprehensive gun laws in other high-income countries have limited access to high-capacity magazines and assault weapons. Research from the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research indicates that states with bans on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines have fewer mass shootings and less lethal outcomes when shootings do occur. These types of firearms are often used in mass shootings, making their regulation a critical component of any comprehensive gun control strategy.
Despite the evidence supporting stricter gun laws, political and cultural barriers often hinder their implementation. The Pew Research Center reports that Americans are deeply divided on gun policy, with 53% favoring stricter gun laws and 46% opposed. This polarization makes it challenging to pass meaningful legislation at the federal level, though some states have made progress on their own.
Understanding which demographic groups are most likely to use guns can also inform policy decisions. According to the Pew Research Center, 36% of white Americans report owning a gun, compared to 24% of Black Americans and 15% of Hispanics. This indicates that gun ownership is more prevalent among white Americans, which aligns with data showing that white individuals are more frequently involved in mass shootings, while minority communities bear the brunt of everyday gun violence.
Addressing gun violence in America requires a multifaceted approach that includes stricter gun laws. Expanding background checks, regulating high-capacity magazines and assault weapons, and targeting interventions in the most affected communities are essential steps. By implementing evidence-based policies, America can reduce the incidence of gun violence and create safer communities for all Americans.
I’d love to hear from you!